About prize winner comment (August 26, 2020)
We publish prize winner comment of highest award "ring/Takuya Sone + Tatsunori Sakamoto + Azusa Uchimura + Takeji Maehara of forest and person".
Prize winner comment
Ring/representative applicant Takuya Sone of forest and person
Firstly we would like to express our heartfelt sympathy to people suffered from by this heavy rain disaster. In such situation, we speak comment about having had prize that it prospers, and there is although being very sorry.
When precious forest resource which citizen protected designed restroom of "forest of Mt. Tateda rest" from urban development of Kumamoto-shi, "harmony with rich nature of Tateda mountain", "forestry activation by use of log" fixed "consideration of hygiene side" in concept, and forest and people wanted to make place that could live together.
Structure housing with "log" melts into Mt. Tateda where rich trees rise with natural texture and, also, as yield can well use wood, we regain wood original value which Japan valued from ancient times and think that it is for one solution to contribute to circulation of forest.About result of the last examination (July 31, 2020)
By future design, we value opinion that we had from various places of valuable viewpoint and judge of various places of other applicants opened to the public and it is sincere and wants to realize facility loved by visiting Tateda mountain.
1. The last examination result of public design competition
Title of work
The metropolis and districts
| The highest award|| Forest and a person's ring|| Takuya Sone + Tatsunori Sakamoto + Azusa Uchimura + Takeji Maehara|
| Award for excellence|| Roof which acts in concert with Mt. Tateda|| Shogo Urabe + Motoki Sato + Kaname Nishijima|
| Fine work|| Commensal light|| Yusuke Sagawa + Takuya Tsuji|
| Fine work|| Birdhouse Toilet|| Yusuke Matsuda|
| Fine work|| Place of recreation and relaxation for everybody - whom deck of Leafy Roof Lavatory - ease makes|| ikuryuon|
| Fine work|| Rest room of "the forest museum"|| Takayuki Kuzushima|
| Fine work|| Base of learning in heap of gusset mountains which is in classroom gusset|| kikui*o + Shinichiro Motoyama|
| Fine work|| Laminated fori of tree and concrete and glass|| Kentaro Yamada|
| Fine work|| Visit to worship hall of a Buddhist temple of Mt. Tateda|| Hiroki Iwasaki|
| Fine work|| Oasis of forest of PRIMITIVE HUT rest|| Hiromichi Ota + Takuya Kitamura|
※We publish fine work in rearranging numerical order in application reception desk.
2. Judge long comment
Commissioner judge long/Kumamoto art police Toyoo Ito
We would like to express our heartfelt sympathy to people suffered from by this heavy rain disaster some other time. In Kumamoto art police, we are starting support of pattern that is poor ability mainly on temporary housing housing complex plan and meeting facility "house of all" plan on the basis of experience of restoration, revival from Kumamoto earthquake. Corona evil came to decide top flight plan after very difficult examination discussion from entry of 279 from the situation bottom, the whole country that were not settled, too.
Have already announced in HP of Kumamoto, but 10 plan of the election is reference number in the prejudging: "Visit to worship hall of a Buddhist temple of Tateda mountain" Hiroki Iwasaki, 270 are "oasis of forest of PRIMITIVE HUT rest" Hiromichi Ota "laminating fori of tree and concrete and glass" Kentaro Yamada, 253 "roof agreeing with Tateda mountain" Shogo Urabe, 239 "base of learning in mountain which there is in classroom gusset of gusset mountain" kikui*o, 181 "ring a person's with forest" Takuya Sone, 162 "rest room of the forest museum" Takayuki Kuzushima, 140 "oasis - of all which roof of Leafy Roof Lavatory- ease makes" ikuryuon, 62 "Birdhouse Toilet" Yusuke Matsuda, 39 "commensal light" Yusuke Sagawa, 21 15 when we introduce in "work title" representative applicants.
Besides we confirmed that we assumed the highest award, award for excellence of second, the remainder 8 plan of prejudging passage fine work beforehand on examining.
In the best plan, 140 elected "ring a person's with forest" Takuya Sone (representative applicant), Tatsunori Sakamoto (joint applicant), Azusa Uchimura (same as above), Takeji Maehara (same as above). It is plan with eloquence that wind blows through with lightness. Tender ringed roof of reciprocal exchange structure that made log becomes the biggest characteristic. Restroom booth and rest space are arranged with linkage under the roof and plan to feel adjacent connection with festival open space. At the time of application product, task is left for realization of structure which it is characterized by, and it seems to be necessary to repeat reconsideration about restroom booth and relations of roof in future. When it considered term of works, construction cost or maintenance shown in application essential point, problem was clear, and it became decisive factor of judgment that there seemed to be least failure.
As for the award for excellence that was second, it was "roof which agreed with Tateda mountain" Shogo Urabe (representative applicant), Motoki Sato (joint applicant), Kaname Nishijima (same as above) 181. You may say that it is maximum problem product in this application product. Novel form which had entrance such as Chinese gable in central part of curved surface roof of hinoki skin roofing and copper sheet roofing to cover up curve plane like bat was work which strongly remained in impression. Roof of hinoki skin roofing approaches festival open space side until eyes of 1m above the ground, and the other side comes to plan to be able to look at garden with Mt. Tateda as making use of the surrounding landscape in the design of a garden from each restroom booth. It is work which enthusiasm on work is transmitted through pressingly. However, we repeated discussions over possibility of realization, but were not able to find means to wipe out doubt whether or not project was established within *joken.
At first, we narrowed down 279 works to 34 works by vote of prejudging and exchanged opinions for each plan by remote examination only for judge next when we looked back on examination process and elected 10 works which advanced to this examination. We had the secretariat gather up common question, individual question and the applicant answer for 10 works which each judge made before this examination.
Each judge performs vote of three votes of one based on question answer by this examination, and 6 works will be left. We tried decision of the best plan from this, but were not able to lead to conclusion. There was place that felt doubt when superior in each plan each, and there was opinion that judgment only for drawing and document might be limited and narrowed down to 3 works in a hurry, and we changed day, and applicant and judge would have a question-and-answer session with remote directly and decided top flight plan and excellence plan.
As for one remainder of 3 works which we competed for until the last remote examination, 39 is "oasis - of all whom roof of Leafy Roof Lavatory- ease makes" ikuryuon. It is work which stably attracted many votes from prejudging to this examination. Organic roof such as leaf is pretty, and there are few problems, and plan of restroom part is work to be able to have of good feeling, too. We felt that we were short of persuasive explanation to wipe out structure of roof part and doubt for gap processing with restroom booth and ceiling side.
A word will touch the remainder 3 work of 6 squeezed works by vote of this examination of thing which was not left for remote examination. Story that we made with the only plan that "base of learning in mountain which there was in classroom gusset of gusset mountain" repaired existing restroom and left for while taking workshop marked line with other plans 162. It did not lead to evaluation that problems and repair of restroom repair plan did not lead to cost decrease. Molding to feel was attractive, but opinion to bring into question about problem by combination of material which had tree floor finish and different property, validity of location in such a place was asked about linear strength that laminated different material such as laminated lumber, concrete block, glass block by "laminating fori of tree and concrete and glass" 239. In "the visit to worship hall of a Buddhist temple of Tateda mountain", uniqueness of idea that was going to apply church architecture of basilica format to restroom remained in impression 253. Uniqueness characteristics stood out in the whole as well as 181. Problems such as semicolumn steel sheet wall finish of restroom booth remained in fine work which there was.
We were going to release the exchanges of examination that we open all A1 application panels in the naraba audience and venue where applicant is, but will originally examine remote under the influence of unexpected corona evil. We will have tripartite people who stayed till the last cope with questions and answers with remote and guess that psychological burden was big.
If given condition changes, there are both superiority and inferiority and what to think to have had possibilities to have been strange naturally. In addition, addition gets that we cannot deny possibility that totally different plans were chosen if this is idea competition.
We finish examination and think that it is the best gain that was able to feel hot energy with all the judges, fresh of applicant. We believe that people of team chosen as the best plan try hard for realization of building which understands as representative of 279 works and want to send yell.
In closing, we thank the all the applicants. We ask for having trend of Kumamoto art police pay attention and will expect for second challenge from now on.
3. About process of examination
From the viewpoint of prevention of infection spread of new coronavirus infectious disease, we carried out this public design competition as follows. In addition, we had an interview with remote for 3 works in a hurry and examined as in comment of the judge head.
1) Prejudging : We choose 10 plan at online meeting only for judge
2) Question answer : About question from judge, person of prejudging passage (10 people) replies by email
3) This examination (the first): We choose 3 plans that we have an interview at online meeting only for judge and examine
4) Interview examination : Judge carries out interview examination with remote for interview examination eligible people (tripartite)
5) This examination (the second): We choose top flights at online meeting only for judge
4. About exhibition of examination material (suggestion work)
5. About exhibition of examination material (question answer)
6. About Perth, model photograph
We publish a part of Perth, the model photograph below.
[highest award/forest and a person's ring]
[roof acting in concert with Mt. award for excellence/Tateda]
7. About 34 works which vote entered by prejudging (August 19, 2020)
Among 34 works which vote entered by prejudging, the remainder 24 works except 10 works which passed prejudging are as follows.
Perth of 24 works disseminates information in SNS.
Title of work
The metropolis and districts
Small environmental body
Ikumi Yoshida + Yukiko Kondo
We make oasis becoming base of park
Existence pillar space and the sum hut of homogeneity
Veil of forest
tatsutayama 50 line
Yusuke Abe + Sota Tsukamoto + Daiki Ihara + Kokura sound of wind + osu Kate Jun
Hill of tower and tree of wind to connect open space and forest
Yoshihisa Ishibashi + choehoki
Terra-toilet (terra restroom)
We prepare Tsukiyama and small roof into hill of Tateda
Kohei Kudo + Hikari Oguro + Kaito Ikuta
Young leave and rain of forest
Kei Sato +Aleksandra Kovaleva
Ecology of roof rain and wind of meeting
daihoshunhei + Yasuhiro Tsutsumi
Public toilet which water hole connects
Floating roof and wall to wear
We put when in this
Small forest of the foot of mountain
Atsushi Fujita + Sadaharu Aoto + Shinya Sueyoshi
Restroom to send off to nine forests
Tetsuo Hatakeyama + Taiki Yoshino + Satoshi Murakami
Public toilet of forest of rest
Yusei Shioiri + ya﨑*dai + Yuta Kadokawa
Construction of restroom - Tateda heap of earth - to prolong nature
Ko Maruyama + Kota Katsuyama + 髙kyowakana
Wooden box which creates difference and connection
Perch of way
Forest of peasants of the mutual help system living with area
Takumi Tsujikawa + Itsuki Tsujikawa + Shota Kano + Kotaro Watanabe
Restroom of sunshine filtering through foliage
※We publish in rearranging numerical order. Applicant name publishes only person consented to for exhibition.
Even Kumamoto art police Facebook sends information.
Access from this! ⇒https://www.facebook.com/kumamotoartpolis/ (Facebook)
8. About the choice of the prefecture cooperation office
As person chosen as the highest award belongs to authorized architect office performing authorized architect office registration, we will not choose about the prefecture cooperation office.
About result of prejudging (July 8, 2020)
1. Prejudging result of public design competition
1. The application situation
The number of application: 279 cases
2. Person of prejudging passage
| Reference number|| Title of work|
(joint application representative)
|The metropolis and districts |
| 15|| Commensal light|| Yusuke Sagawa||Saitama|
| 21|| Birdhouse Toilet|| Yusuke Matsuda||Fukuoka|
| 39|| Place of recreation and relaxation for everybody - whom deck of Leafy Roof Lavatory - ease makes|| ikuryuon||Tokyo|
| 62|| Rest room of "the forest museum"|| Takayuki Kuzushima||Aichi|
| 140|| Forest and a person's ring|| Takuya Sone||Tokyo|
| 162|| Base of learning in heap of gusset mountains which is in classroom gusset|| kikui*o||Chiba|
| 181|| Roof which acts in concert with Mt. Tateda|| Shogo Urabe||Tokyo|
| 239|| Laminated fori of tree and concrete and glass|| Kentaro Yamada||Tokyo|
| 253|| Visit to worship hall of a Buddhist temple of Mt. Tateda|| Hiroki Iwasaki||Osaka|
| 270|| Oasis of forest of PRIMITIVE HUT rest|| Hiromichi Ota||Kyoto|
※Reference number is application reception number.
2. Judge long comment
Commissioner judge long/Kumamoto art police Toyoo Ito
Heavy rain damage of South Kumamoto area is reported every moment and is surprised at TV coverages. We would like to express our heartfelt sympathy. We deeply appreciated as examination in the middle, but there was limitation in schedule and decided to perform prejudging. As corona evil is still in conditions that are not settled, we will perform in remote examination format this time again.
It may be said that age restriction of 35 years or younger and the results and authorized architect qualification do not matter to this competition, and there is application of 279 works more than the number of the entries of competition of "sargasso van" and is glad very much. According to the count of the secretariat, age of applicant seems to be wide application of width really from Hokkaido to Okinawa in 35 years old from 18 years old, area.
The number of the chosen works amounted to 34 when each judge performed ten votes of votes before remote examination. We elected narrowing, 10 plans to finally advance to this examination to 13 plan by repeating exchange of opinions for by one 34 works as more than three votes might not repeat.
One which become very various, and it is in what examination result for the last time, or point cannot read as for us at all either such as plan full of fantasy as for the chosen 10 plan, plan considered to be very likely to be realization, plan that incorporated repair, modern plan, to be frank.
Besides, by this examination, we want to act in selection of top flight plan based on questions and answers of 10 people while discussing the way of new wooden public toilet again.
In closing, many young people show great interest for this competition and want to express will of thanks in what we spend serious energy and applied for some other time.
3. Future plan Around Monday, July 13: Question is sent by person of prejudging passage 10
Around Thursday, July 16: Deadline for answer to question
Around the end of July: We announce comment of examination result (the highest award, award for excellence, fine work) and the judge head on homepage
4. Documents examination result of the prefecture cooperation office
As the following people would advance to interview examination, we will tell about the prefecture cooperation office.
The application registration name
Hotta general design
Building plan com Forest Kumamoto design room
| FUMI EGAMI ARCHITECTs|
※Reference number is application reception number.
Revision (May 29, 2020) of application essential point
Kumamoto art police recruits entries of public design competition of forest, festival open space public toilet of Mt. Tateda rest. By application essential point, we planned public examination as examination method of entry in the middle of July, but, for correspondence of new coronavirus infectious disease, we would change "6 examination methods" and "9 submission" of application essential point and announced application essential point (revised edition).
※ We assume part which we revised rubrication.
We added local photograph to column of "public design competition application essential points" as reference materials.
At the same time, we publish application essential point which revised a photography direction of 4 pages "[neighborhood sketch] figure 3" of "01 application essential points".